Read the attached Wippman article and comment on a specific sub-topic of his argument. Then offer your classmates a concise direction for your studies in this class. To accomplish these tasks well, note a definite idea or contention by Wippman and explain how it pertains to what you would like to learn in this course. Cite this article appropriately, and ensure that you are NOT simply summarizing his key points. We need to focus on application of the materials, rather than reiteration. Next, explain your area of interest to your classmates. (Yes, this initial notion will probably change, but we need a place to begin.) For example, you might be interested in Chicana/o communities, or you might want to better understand Gender Studies and the LBGT community. It is your choice. When you address this latter question, you must provide evidence for your reasoning and selection–i.e. this is a perfect place for your additionally required secondary source.

Discussion of the required readings and/or materials is crucial to understanding the historical, social, political, linguistic, and/or philosophical aspects of each piece and how they represent an investment in or critique of culture through mimesis. Therefore, students are required to answer weekly discussion board questions in a minimum of 150 words and respond to at least two of their classmates in 75 words each. Initial posts are due by 11:59 on Friday of each work week, and responses to classmates are due by 11:59 on Sunday of each work week. At least one additional scholarly source is required to support students’ initial claims each week, and each source must be correctly cited in-text (as a parenthetical reference) and in the Work Cited in MLA style and format. (The materials I provide in the course DO NOT count towards your secondary sources. Outside research is required for every assignment). Do not delay. Late or incomplete posts, responses, written arguments, etc. will be penalized heavily.